[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Question regarding correlating output and IQ samp
From: |
Marcus Müller |
Subject: |
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Question regarding correlating output and IQ samples in a reciever |
Date: |
Sat, 30 Jan 2016 11:05:43 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 |
Hi Abhinav,
> I don't think OOK is constant power modulation, but I suppose S+N/N
should still apply on it.
It applies, but you must be aware of the fact that transmissions have a
different ratio of "on" symbols and "off" symbols have different
energy/power. So without knowing how many ons and offs you were sending,
that number is pretty meaningless.
Best regards,
Marcus
- [Discuss-gnuradio] Question regarding correlating output and IQ samples in a reciever, abhinav narain, 2016/01/24
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Question regarding correlating output and IQ samples in a reciever, abhinav narain, 2016/01/25
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Question regarding correlating output and IQ samples in a reciever, Marcus Müller, 2016/01/26
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Question regarding correlating output and IQ samples in a reciever, abhinav narain, 2016/01/26
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Question regarding correlating output and IQ samples in a reciever, Marcus Müller, 2016/01/27
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Question regarding correlating output and IQ samples in a reciever, abhinav narain, 2016/01/27
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Question regarding correlating output and IQ samples in a reciever, Marcus Müller, 2016/01/28
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Question regarding correlating output and IQ samples in a reciever, abhinav narain, 2016/01/29
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Question regarding correlating output and IQ samples in a reciever,
Marcus Müller <=
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Question regarding correlating output and IQ samples in a reciever, abhinav narain, 2016/01/30
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Question regarding correlating output and IQ samples in a reciever, Marcus Müller, 2016/01/31