Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Adding OOT module to CGRAN

[Chris Kuethe]

Actually "incorrect" is too strong. It's valid syntax, but it's a
no-op since there are no binary packages which would satisfy the
install.

On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 11:13 AM, Chris Kuethe <address@hidden> wrote:
> Thanks - I already added a recipe.
>
> I'm don't think the satisfy section is correct, as there are no
> resullts returned by "apt search polaris" or "port search polaris" on
> my machines.
>
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Smith, Brandon <address@hidden> wrote:
>> I have the recipe file ready and it's published at: 
>> https://github.com/drs-ss/drs-gr-recipes
>>
>> -Brandon Smith
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Chris Kuethe [mailto:address@hidden
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2016 1:59 PM
>> To: Smith, Brandon <address@hidden>
>> Cc: address@hidden
>> Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Adding OOT module to CGRAN
>>
>> Thanks for the heads up. I'll add this to PyBOMBS.
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Smith, Brandon <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> We have just published our first OOT module to Github (
>>> https://github.com/drs-ss/gr-polaris )and would like to get the module
>>> published on CGRAN. The instructions I found point me to the
>>> gnuradio-legacy recipes repo. I am guessing we shouldn’t be submitting
>>> pulls requests to the legacy repo. So should we submit to the gr-recipes or 
>>> gr-etcetera?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Also, is there a way we can be indexed for CGRAN without submitting
>>> pull requests to gr-recipes or gr-etcetera?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> - Brandon Smith
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>>> address@hidden
>>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> GDB has a 'break' feature; why doesn't it have 'fix' too?
>>
>
>
>
> --
> GDB has a 'break' feature; why doesn't it have 'fix' too?



-- 
GDB has a 'break' feature; why doesn't it have 'fix' too?