Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] fail tests for qa_cpp_py_binding qa_cpp_py_binding_set qa_ctrlport_probes

[address@hidden]

Since "make test" precedes "make install" and that I had an older
version of gnuradio running, I did the "make install" with the new
build. The ctest command was run from the build directory.

http://pastebin.com/DWjY0YQ8

On Sun, 26 Mar 2017 16:55:12 +0200
Marcus Müller <address@hidden> wrote:

> Hi nameless :)
> 
> could you share the output of
> 
> ctest -V -R cpp_py
> 
> ctest -V -R ctrlport_probes
> 
> with us?
> 
> 
> Regarding Boost: well, yeah, 1.54. is indeed not very recent, but
> *should* work. Same goes for the slightly dusty GCC 4.8.5; however,
> it's pretty uncommon to see  a rather recent SWIG (3.0.10 in your
> case) paired with these two. So that's a bit surprising!
> 
> Best regards,
> Marcus
> 
> On 03/26/2017 12:16 PM, address@hidden wrote:
> > From make test:
> > The following tests FAILED:
> >          24 - qa_cpp_py_binding (Failed)
> >          25 - qa_cpp_py_binding_set (Failed)
> >          26 - qa_ctrlport_probes (Failed)
> >
> >
> > Building for version: 3.7.12git-44-g0d5fd62c / 3.7.12git
> > Linux linux.suse 4.4.49-16-default #1 SMP Sun Feb 19 17:40:35 UTC
> > 2017 (70e9954) x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> >
> > The output from cmake is at this pastebin
> > http://pastebin.com/W5SidSsY
> >
> > OS is opensuse 42.2. I changed the rev of thrift to 0.9.3 since some
> > threads seem to believe the old rev causes an error.
> >
> > My boost is a bit old:
> > Boost version: 1.54.0
> >
> > I can probably upgrade to 1.61 without too much work if that helps.
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio  
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio