|
From: | Qurat-Ul-Ann Akbar |
Subject: | Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] IEEE 802.11 Transceiver Module - Timing offset at receiver side |
Date: | Sun, 4 Jun 2017 12:07:58 -0500 |
On 06/04/2017 05:35 PM, Qurat-Ul-Ann Akbar wrote:
Then what could be the problem for a low SNR. The average power I see at the receiver is -100 to -120 db and the signal is too distorted within noise.
This can have many reasons (including gain, interference, DC offsets, LO leakage, etc etc.) I think it will take some more effort from your side to find out what's going wrong.
You might find lots of helpful information on
- wime-project.net/installation/
- the GNU Radio Wiki
- the mailing list archive
- Stack overflow
And I watched your video on YouTube in which you were showing a demo of the WiFi receiver. In that video you had big antennas and I don't think those were Vert 2450.
If the video shows larger dipoles with cables, they were ECOM9-5500. Again, I don't believe that the antennas are your problem. I used the transceiver successfully with many different antennas, including the Vert 2450 that you are using.
Best regards,
Bastian
On Jun 4, 2017 11:21 AM, "Bastian Bloessl" <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:
On 06/04/2017 05:16 PM, Qurat-Ul-Ann Akbar wrote:
I understand. But you didnt connect them directly to the USRP.
You used some cable to connect the two and had a stand for your
antenna. Can you tell me which cable was that ?
I have no idea what you are talking about. When I used the Vert
antennas, I connected them directly to the USRP.
If you experience low SNR you'll probably not improve things if you
add cables between the SDR and the antenna. I doubt that the antenna
or cables are your problem.
Best,
Bastian
On Jun 4, 2017 11:13 AM, "Bastian Bloessl" <address@hidden<mailto:address@hidden> <mailto:address@hidden
<mailto:address@hidden>>> wrote:
Hi,
On 06/04/2017 04:25 PM, Qurat-Ul-Ann Akbar wrote:
Thank you for the explanation. Can you tell me which
antennas
did you use for your experiments when you wrote your paper?
Because I think a major problem with my receiver is a
very low
SNR because everything works fine with simulations.
Currently I
am using Vert 2450 antenna with my USRP N210.
I used the same setup with the Vert 2450 antennas.
Best,
Bastian
On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 12:33 PM, Bastian Bloessl
<address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>
<mailto:address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>>
<mailto:address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>
<mailto:address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>>>> wrote:
Hi,
On 6/3/2017 9:11 PM, Qurat-Ul-Ann Akbar wrote:
Hello,
How is the timing offset being handled in the
802.11
module. I
see that the sync_long block does frequency offset
correction
and the frame_equalizer block does the phase
correction
but I
dont understand where is the timing offset being
handled. Can
anyone tell me which algorithm is being used
to do that?
The Sync Long block correlates the signal with the
known
pattern of
the long preamble to derive how the FFTs have to
be aligned
in time.
Best,
Bastian
-- Dipl.-Inform. Bastian Bloessl
CONNECT Center
Trinity College Dublin
GitHub/Twitter: @bastibl
https://www.bastibl.net/
--
Dipl.-Inform. Bastian Bloessl
CONNECT Center
Trinity College Dublin
GitHub/Twitter: @bastibl
https://www.bastibl.net/
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |