discuss-gnuradio
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] FFT size constraints?


From: Marcus D. Leech
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] FFT size constraints?
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2017 15:44:32 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0

On 12/01/2017 03:33 PM, John Ackermann N8UR wrote:
Attached is a screenshot of the error I get when trying to set the FFT size in the QT Frequency Sink to 16384.  It's possible, I suppose, that it could be the sink block, and not the FFT itself, that poses the limitation.

John
This is definitely a Qt FFT sink thing.   I've used very-large (500K-bins) FFTs for doing de-dispersion in the past, without any issue.


On 12/01/2017 12:02 PM, Müller, Marcus (CEL) wrote:
What error does GNU Radio throw (that's the critical piece of info!)..

There's no restriction of FFT sizes.

Best regards,
Marcus

On Thu, 2017-11-30 at 14:28 -0500, John Ackermann N8UR wrote:
By convention, FFT sizes seem to be powers of 2.  And Gnu Radio
Companion throws an error if you try to set a size of 16384 -- but will
accept 16383.

In some cases, I'd like to match FFT size to sample rate.  For example,
with a 100 sample/second rate, I'd like to use a 100 bin FFT to
(hopefully) get 1.0 frames per second.

Is using a non-power-of-2 FFT simply less efficient, or are there other
concerns?

And is there a reason why GRC sets the limit at one less than 16384?  If
8192 is the max because of power-of-two requirements, it would be more
helpful to state the limitation as ">8192" rather than "<16384".

Thanks,
John

_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio


_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]