[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: problem with NSConnection and NSThread

From: richard
Subject: Re: problem with NSConnection and NSThread
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2000 14:45:21 +0000

On Tuesday, November 7, 2000, at 01:51 PM, address@hidden wrote:

> Dear subscribers, 
> I'm having problems in using remote objects (via NSConnection) from 
> within newly created threads (NSThread). Some code to illustrate the 
> problem: 
> // ---------- 
>     // initialize the connection to the server 
>     //   This method connects to the server process on a remote host 
>     //   and stores a reference to the (remote) vended object. 
>     [connectionController initConnection]; 
>     // now use the remote object 
>     //   Invoke a method of the remote object (receiving app doesn't 
>     //   call back our sending app). 
>     [connectionController performRemoteTask:nil]; 
>     // ok, works as expected 
>     // now try to use the remote object from a new thread 
>     //   Same as obove except the thread. 
>     [NSThread detachNewThreadSelector:@selector(performRemoteTask:) 
>           toTarget:connectionController withObject:nil]; 
>     // raises exception: 
>     //   NSPortTimeoutException: timed out waiting for reply 
> // ---------- 
> My setup: Linux/ix86, gcc 2.95.2 with patched libobjc (NSLock problem), 
> GNUstep snapshot-20001107 (make and base). 
> What am I doing wrong? Any hints are highly appreciated. 

Hmm - my problem is that I'm not sure what the expected behavior is - my 
is/was that connections are basically per-thread entities - certainly runloops 

When the connection is created, it will add its receiving port to the runloop 
of the
current thread - so messages for that connection will be recieved in that 
When you send to the proxy to the remote object in another thread, the outgoing
message will be sent, but the runloop in that thread won't be listening for any 
so you get the NSPortTimeoutException.
That explains the symptoms - but doesn't get any closer to deciding how it 
should behave.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]