[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A killer app?
Re: A killer app?
Thu, 25 Jan 2001 17:26:17 -0800 (PST)
--- Helge Hess <address@hidden> wrote:
> Jason H Clouse wrote:
> > <<I mostly disagree. I don't need YASW (yet-another-shell-wrapper), I'm
> > quite happy with bash, yast and/or available LDAP tools. Having a
> > UserManager doesn't give me any additional value (indeed the
> > additional value of the NeXTstep UserManager is not the UI>>
> > Maybe. But it sure would be nicer than the RedHat tools.
> Who uses RedHat ;-) Try SuSE, they have nice and working admin tools.
> Note: I'm not against writing admin tools in GNUstep. I would like that
> to. I only say that this won't help GNUstep get more users.
> > <<What I miss on Linux are productivity applications done in a
> > consistent, interoperable manner. Diagram, OpenWrite, Improv, Mail,
> > OmniWeb, WetPaint and for development, IB, PB.>>
> > How true. Unfortunately, I hear that it's difficult to get OpenStep
> > developers to port their software. Isn't there any way we can put some
> > pressure on Omni or something? We *at least* need a decent web browser.
> > I'm getting really sick of Netscape 4.7.
> I'm pretty sure that if an OpenStep application (better: MacOSX
> application) would 'just-compile' as is, most OpenStep developer would
> port quickly. Right now it still would take significant time to do so
> (and probably expose loads of bugs) and I guess eg OmniGroup just don't
> have that time and a different focus anyway.
I have taken a few OpenStep applications and *just compiled* them using
GNUstep. The biggest problem is not the code, but the nib files. I've got a
version of FreeSpace almost working. The only reason I haven't released it is
1) I don't feel it's ready since I haven't finished the nibs for it 2) I don't
have a great deal of spare time and 3) I've got a few other things I'm doing
for GNUstep which are more important.
I ported the Chronographer library which almost no changes. I also start on a
port for the Sen:te CVL application. Although I was able to port SenFoundation
and SenTestingKit, I am having problems compling the SenOyster library because
of some non-portable (read not OPENSTEP) code which depends on the perl.h and
EXTERN.h header files.
> Regarding the Web-Browser: A small browser object/view would be fine,
> but IMHO it is more important to plugin/reuse Mozilla/Gecko. You are not
> going to write a usable browser in reasonable time (BTW: I don't really
> consider OmniWeb *that* usable, IE is far better !).
> BTW: this is true for a text-editor as well -> plugin XEmacs :-)
> BTW2: since some month there is also 'OmniGraffle', which is a diagram
> clone for MacOSX. Would be cool if this could be ported to GNUstep ;-)
> SKYRIX Software AG http://www.skyrix.com/
> Join the team: http://www.skyrix.com/de/jobs/index.html
> Discuss-gnustep mailing list
Gregory John Casamento Sr. Software Engineer
Software patents are endangering the computer industry
in the US and around the world. Join the LPF and help
the cause. http://lpf.ai.mit.edu/
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices.
Re: A killer app?, Gregory Casamento, 2001/01/26
- Re: A killer app?, (continued)
- Re: A killer app?,
Gregory Casamento <=