[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Can we use Jigs
From: |
Nicola Pero |
Subject: |
Re: Can we use Jigs |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Sep 2001 02:36:30 +0100 (BST) |
I am sure you misunderstood Kotesh.
Nobody is talking about replacing the GNUstep DO code in the
gnustep-base library with anything else, it's an idea which makes no
sense. Kotesh was talking about an alternative distributed
communication mechanism to use in his own app.
Gregory> I believe that CORBA is a better solution to this problem
Gregory> because it is: Pros: 1) Language independent: CORBA has
Gregory> bindings for C, C++, and Java. 2) A more widely accepted
Gregory> standard than either JMS or RMI and, as such, would allow
Gregory> communication to non-java and non-GNU-DO applications.
Gregory> Cons: 1) May not be as flexible as DO, but I can't speak
Gregory> to this since I don't know CORBA. What does tying core
Gregory> to jigs buy us? Pros: 1) Allows us to communicate with
Gregory> Java Programs as well as our stuff via RMI/JMS (etc.)
Gregory> Cons: 1) It would make JIGS mandatory in order to even
Gregory> build the core libraries, unless, of course, it is
Gregory> conditionally compiled in if JIGS is present. 2) Code
Gregory> would no longer be "pure" Objective-C.
- Cannot compile nib2gmodel, William Swats, 2001/09/09
- Re: Cannot compile nib2gmodel, Adam Fedor, 2001/09/09
- Can we use Jigs, Kotesh, 2001/09/10
- Re: Can we use Jigs, Nicola Pero, 2001/09/10
- Re: Can we use Jigs, Kotesh, 2001/09/10
- Re: Can we use Jigs, Gregory Casamento, 2001/09/10
- Re: Can we use Jigs,
Nicola Pero <=
- Re: Can we use Jigs, Gregory Casamento, 2001/09/10
- Re: Can we use Jigs, Kotesh, 2001/09/11
- Re: Can we use Jigs, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2001/09/11
- Re: Can we use Jigs, Helge Hess, 2001/09/20
- Re: Can we use Jigs, Björn Gohla, 2001/09/20
- Re: Can we use Jigs, Kotesh, 2001/09/11
- Re: Can we use Jigs, Gregory Casamento, 2001/09/10