[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Proposition for a Gorm feature Was: Gorm too complex ?
From: |
Bjoern Giesler |
Subject: |
Re: Proposition for a Gorm feature Was: Gorm too complex ? |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Feb 2002 09:31:25 +0100 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Am Dienstag, 12. Februar 2002 08:45 schrieb Chris Hanson:
> PS - One of the big things that has held GNUstep back over the 4
> years I've been following it is feature-creep. Just an observation.
Seconded. There are enough things missing in Gorm to make it usable right
now -- gridding, working multiple selections, aligning etc. Why don't we
first produce something that works really well for GNUstep, and then
start enhancing that for portability?
Regards,
--Björn
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.8
iQA/AwUBPGjS3cjvWsQJsktKEQIJTgCg+303ffAL0ONvJo0K5UFHZVmQ7CUAnipV
dMffoAW5+su+ukcYaDpLUBFr
=w19I
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: Proposition for a Gorm feature Was: Gorm too complex, Pascal Bourguignon, 2002/02/11