discuss-gnustep
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: import vs include Re: Porting autogsdoc to OSX


From: Marcus Müller
Subject: Re: import vs include Re: Porting autogsdoc to OSX
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 20:01:44 +0100

On Wednesday, February 27, 2002, at 07:46 PM, Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:

On Wednesday, February 27, 2002, at 06:32 PM, Marcus Müller wrote:
Finally, I don't think the autogsdoc example is particularly relevant ...
it was meant to be an internal GNUstep base tool, and only recently
Richard changed his mind :-) and thought it would be good to port it to MacOSX. So it's not particularly surprising that it depends on a lot of

What? I thought that was my idea - hence the reason for the whole thread.

It was your idea .. but Nicola was right ... you changed my mind - I had not
thought anyone would want it on MacOS

Hear hear! I deserve the credits for having started the latest flamewar! ;-))

I thought that maybe just having a separate library, and having the base
library depend upn that library (so it links it in) would be easier to use
than a bundle.
I actually spent two minutes hacking in an option to the base library
makefile to do this, putting GSXML and GSMime stuff in libgnustep_baseadd
as a proof of concept.
So, certainly I want to mode stuff into a separate subdirectory within
the base package, but I don't yet really know whether having the
'additions' stuff as a library or a bundle would be best.

Anyway, we would then be able to do something like 'make additions=yes' to
build the additions stuff without the main base library.

Progress! :-)
That's exactly what I do need in order to make a framework project on OS X of it. I've identified a couple of categories which obviously can make it there, too. However, some things seem to be more constrained (because they refer to instance variables directly [for performance reasons I guess]) i.e. NSScanner's radix additions, which cannot easily be ripped out of base and expected to work on OS X for that matter. They need to be rewritten in parts (if one really needs it), but that's actually the problem of the OS X guys and shouldn't concern the core GNUsteppers. Later tonight I can make that stuff available on http://www.mulle-kybernetik.com for review - I don't have it on my laptop, unfortunately, and I'm still at work.

Cheers,

  Marcus


--
Marcus Mueller  .  .  .  crack-admin/coder ;-)
Mulle kybernetiK  .  http://www.mulle-kybernetik.com
Current projects: finger znek@mulle-kybernetik.com




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]