On Saturday, November 30, 2002, at 03:30 am, Chris Hanson wrote:
At 9:38 PM +0100 11/27/02, Manuel Guesdon wrote:
o It as has a lot of features so it's not completely tested
(we had
recently an exemple of different people using GSWCheckBoxList with
different bindings. Someone has fixed what it considered as a bug so
it worked for him but no more for me so I had to rewrite some part
of code to be
sure that it works for both of us)
Are the developers working on the various pieces of GNUstep creating
comprehensive unit tests for the code they're writing? (I.e. by
using a unit-testing framework like OCUnit from Sen:te and having all
tests run every build?)
This is only in place for the base library really ... and can hardly
be called 'comprehensive' as there are only a few thousand tests.
See dev-apps/test/gtests in CVS
People are of course encouraged to contribute tests, but it's no more
glamorous than writing documentation ...