Re: MulleEOInterface

[David Ayers]

Dirk Theisen wrote:

> > Ok, thanks, but then, in the GNU case, you have to be careful of the
> > side effects lest you should lose performance or more evil things
> > happen. In this special case it was
> >
> >  objc_msgSend([objects objectAtIndex: i], selector, argument)
> >
> > which after expansion will search the array twice.
>
>
> Maybe this should be "static inline" functions then?

Hi Dirk,

Would you please chect if,
#ifdef GNUSTEP
#include <gnustep/base/objc-gnu2next.h>
#endif

would do the trick?
I haven't looked into which runtime functions are used expilictily, but 
this header should do the mapping. for most.

But please check whether class_getClassMethod is used anywhere.  
Eventhough a maping exists, the parameters, that the two runtimes expect 
are different.  I haven't had time to finish up my GSObjCRuntime patch 
yet, withi which I also wanted to submit a patch to this header to 
remove the mapping.

Also check whether the code ever does selector comparison with == as 
this is at the least unsafe for the GNU runtime.  You should replace 
them with sel_eq(). But then you would probably need something like:

#ifdef GNUSTEP
#include <gnustep/base/objc-gnu2next.h>
#else
#define sel_eq(sel1,sel2) (sel1 == sel2)
#endif

Cheers,
Dave