[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: DO broadcast
|
From: |
Chris B. Vetter |
|
Subject: |
Re: DO broadcast |
|
Date: |
Tue, 15 Jul 2003 14:02:06 -0700 |
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003 22:52:47 +0200
Tobias <ibotty@web.de> wrote:
> > All current implementations you can get off the 'net have a
> > draw-back: They are implemented as a daemon taking only one service
> > to advertise at a time. That means if you want to advertise 3
> > different services, you need to run 3 separate instances ... Not
> > very efficient.
> you are right,
> but only one seems to be neccessary in his case.
> nevertheless, time for me to work on the kame implementation again..
I just finished implementing AF_INET6 and AF_LINK (though more or less
untested). Next I plan on implementing asynchronous usage and MCAST on
top of that (the idea is having sth similar to CFSocket). That should be
enough for looking into implementing sth similar to Rendezvous.
--
Chris
- DO broadcast, niviaud, 2003/07/10
- Re: DO broadcast, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2003/07/10
- Re: DO broadcast, Stefan Urbanek, 2003/07/10
- Re: DO broadcast, Damien Genet, 2003/07/14
- Re: DO broadcast, Tobias, 2003/07/15
- Re: DO broadcast, Chris B. Vetter, 2003/07/15
- Re: DO broadcast, Tobias, 2003/07/15
- Re: DO broadcast,
Chris B. Vetter <=
- Re: DO broadcast, Tobias, 2003/07/15
- Re: DO broadcast, Chris B. Vetter, 2003/07/15
Message not available