|
From: | David Ayers |
Subject: | Re: New warnings (hopefully) in gcc 3.4 |
Date: | Wed, 03 Sep 2003 12:20:06 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030507 |
Nicola Pero wrote:
[...] The @encode mechanism would still not recognize that -(id)method:(NSSize)aSize and -(id)method:(NSPoint)aPoint are equivalent.Hmmm. Are they really equivalent ? The argument types seem to be quite different.
Alex has just convinced me also. :-)My point was, "it used to work and now it wouldn't" (well the example was bad, I meant:
-(NSSize)method and -(NSPoint)method )But yes, I could live w/o this. I'm just thinking the IMP assumption must always be incorrect, even if it may work in many cases.
Cheers, David
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |