[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: XML idea
From: |
Alex Perez |
Subject: |
Re: XML idea |
Date: |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 14:40:13 -0800 (PST) |
On Tue, 6 Jan 2004, Helge Hess wrote:
> On 06.01.2004, at 22:29, Alex Perez wrote:
> > This is exactly what I was referring to. I think you misunderstood
> > what I
> > meant. the GNUstep team has a policy of keeping XML stuff out of (or at
> > least totally optional in) GNUstep-base.
>
> I don't think that this is still valid. I guess the policy is to keep
> *GSXML* out of gstep-base (though this is the first time I hear of such
> a policy), having NSXMLParser in Cocoa Foundation obviously changes
> that.
The official word, AFAIK, is that XML stuff in general is to be kept out
of base, except on an OPTIONAL basis, which is how it is now. It's not
just GSXML.
>
> At least I would be surprised if Adam, Richard or Nicola would be
> against adding NSXMLParser to gstep-base.
> +5 from me, don't want to work against three different Foundation APIs
> ;-)
It could be put there, but it would only be a class that worked if
--with-xml or whatever were used, same as how GSXML works now.
>
> Greets,
> Helge
>
- Re: XML idea, (continued)
- Re: XML idea, Philippe C . D . Robert, 2004/01/07
- Re: XML idea, Alex Perez, 2004/01/07
- Re: XML idea, Adam Fedor, 2004/01/07
- Message not available
- Re: XML idea, Dr. Nikolaus Schaller, 2004/01/07
- Re: XML idea, Alex Perez, 2004/01/06
- Re: XML idea, Helge Hess, 2004/01/06
- Re: XML idea,
Alex Perez <=
- Re: XML idea, Helge Hess, 2004/01/06
- Re: XML idea, Adam Fedor, 2004/01/06
- Re: XML idea, Alex Perez, 2004/01/06
- Re: XML idea, richard, 2004/01/07
- Re: XML idea, richard, 2004/01/07
RE: XML idea, Mondragon, Ian, 2004/01/07
RE: XML idea, Mondragon, Ian, 2004/01/08