Re: Re[4]: GNUstep.org

[MJ Ray]

On 2004-01-08 00:34:21 +0000 Manuel Guesdon <ml@orange-concept.com> 
wrote:

> On Wed, 07 Jan 2004 22:46:50 +0100 Stefan Urbanek 
> <stefan@agentfarms.net> 
> wrote:
> > | SPIP is really nice and easy to use. If GNUstep were using spip, 
> > it would 
> > be much easier to maintain site contents

Would we lose nearly all our mirrors? We have the gnustep.org ones and 
the gnu.org ones. That's why I'm jumping through hoops to retemplate 
it and part of why it takes a while.

IMO, the problem is that we need more help. A glossy CMS with 
insufficient help will still be bad, just as the current web site with 
insufficient help has been bad.

I'd like to see a news site, but I think there are ones like 
gnustep.us already. Maybe you could work with its owner to improve it? 
The main site needs to make more use of it, for sure.

> I've created style sheets and templates inspired by gnustep.org 
> previous site 
> for http://www.gnustepweb.org.

That looks like the old site, but nearly all answers said that we 
should move away from that when we last asked. Looks quite nice, but 
has a few small problems: I find it too wide for my browser window and 
the text is very large. Also, the main text is one narrow column in 
links. URLs end in article.php3?id_article=5 when article.php3/5 would 
probably be neater. 42 errors, says 
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A//www.gnustepweb.org/

Can whoever is putting Re[4] and similar switch off "number replies" 
in their mail client, please? TIA.

--
MJR/slef     My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know.
Please http://remember.to/edit_messages on lists to be sure I read
http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ gopher://g.towers.org.uk/ slef@jabber.at
 Creative copyleft computing services via http://www.ttllp.co.uk/