[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Frameworks integration

From: Helge Hess
Subject: Re: Frameworks integration
Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 02:00:56 +0100

On 29.02.2004, at 01:53, NeXT wrote:
Hmm, I think I did make some mistake. I think SOPE cannot be used with GDL2, because it contains EOControl.

Well, so do not compile the EOControl coming with SOPE but just use GDL2 instead ;-)

Granted, there might be some minor issues since we did not try SOPE with GDL2 yet, but after all SOPE/EOControl should be a subset of GDL2/EOControl in case the GDL2 one is really compatible with EOF 4.

And in case of WO compatibility, yes, I cannot find any difference between SOPE and GNUstepWeb. (Yes, my testing application is very simple) And without apple's tool(which I run on windows) SOPE's template definition is more easy with text editor than original WO template definition.

Yes. Actually NGObjWeb did support <WEBOBJECT> tags and it would be rather trivial to "re-add" the support for them. But as you say, the # syntax is way easier to write than the WEBOBJECT one which is only interesting if you want to use rapid-turnaround in SOPE:X (in the case of existing .wo wrappers you can use a trivial SED script to move the <WEBOBJECT> syntax to <#>).

best regards,

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]