[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator
From: |
John C. Randolph |
Subject: |
Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator |
Date: |
Fri, 23 Apr 2004 03:15:18 -0700 |
David Stes wrote:
>
> In comp.lang.objective-c John C. Randolph <jcr@nospam.idiom.com> wrote:
> >
> > If you know of any instance where their behaviors
> > diverge, then by all means, file a bug report.
>
> A bug is something wrong in an otherwise well-design pieced of software.
> Autorelease is not a bug, it is a design mistake.
So you say, but you have consistently failed to support that assertion.
Let us know if you ever come up with a relevant argument against
-retain/-release.
-jcr
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, (continued)
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, David Stes, 2004/04/21
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, John C. Randolph, 2004/04/22
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, Pete French, 2004/04/22
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, David Stes, 2004/04/22
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, John C. Randolph, 2004/04/23
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, David Stes, 2004/04/23
- [stes'sism] Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, Helge Hess, 2004/04/23
- Re: [stes'sism] Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, Greg Parker, 2004/04/23
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, Markus Hitter, 2004/04/23
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator,
John C. Randolph <=
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, David Stes, 2004/04/24
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, Gregory John Casamento, 2004/04/24