Re: Apple scripting extensions (Was: Re: kind of unit testing framework for StepTalk)

[Quentin Mathé]

Le 27 avr. 04, à 13:12, Helge Hess a écrit :

> On Apr 20, 2004, at 10:56 PM, Stefan Urbanek wrote:
>
> > On 2004-04-20 12:02:04 +0200 Helge Hess 
> > <helge.hess@opengroupware.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Stefan,
> > > did you ever consider using the Foundation scripting extensions done 
> > > by Apple for StepTalk?
> > Yes, I have thought about that... however, GNUstep does not provide 
> > them at the moment.
>
> I think it is a good approach to implement them in StepTalk (or some 
> other outside framework) first and if done, move them to base (if 
> people agree to that).

Personally, I would prefer to not have them included in base because 
they rely too heavily on the Apple Event terminology which is rather 
cryptic in my opinion.
I think a better solution with a more simple and generic terminology 
can be created (eventually included in base) and derivated to implement 
compatibility with Cocoa scripting architecture.

Quentin.

--
Quentin Mathé
qmathe@club-internet.fr