[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: System fonts
From: |
Banlu Kemiyatorn |
Subject: |
Re: System fonts |
Date: |
Thu, 26 Aug 2004 17:35:17 +0700 |
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 18:54:54 +0900, Kazunobu Kuriyama
<kazunobu.kuriyama@nifty.com> wrote:
> >I think Yen-Ju is quite clear about the latin characters provided by
> >the CJK fonts
> >that is ugly.
> >
> Do you? It's still not clear to me what you mean by that...
I meant he doesn't like the latin glyph provided in Chinese font.
Because he thinks it's ugly. If he doesn't like it because it didn't
do kerning and using correct ligatures, why should we discussing
glyph substitution in backend rather freetype support (which already
support kerning and partly support ligature) ? He also mentioned
Terminal.app (which didn't use text system). How that relate to
kerning and ligature since Terminal shouldn't use any kind of font
rather mono type?
regards,
]d
- Re: Font substitution (Was: System fonts), (continued)
Re: System fonts, Yen-Ju Chen, 2004/08/26
Re: System fonts, Kazunobu Kuriyama, 2004/08/26
Re: System fonts,
Banlu Kemiyatorn <=
Re: System fonts, Rogelio Serrano, 2004/08/26
Re: System fonts, Banlu Kemiyatorn, 2004/08/26
Re: System fonts, Fred Kiefer, 2004/08/26
Re: System fonts, MJ Ray, 2004/08/26
Re: System fonts, Yen-Ju Chen, 2004/08/26
Re: System fonts, Yen-Ju Chen, 2004/08/26
Re: System fonts, Yen-Ju Chen, 2004/08/27