[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0?
From: |
Phil Edwards |
Subject: |
Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0? |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Nov 2004 03:06:00 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
On Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 08:58:05PM -0500, Chuck Robey wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Nov 2004, Phil Edwards wrote:
>
> >From a lurker, one who likes objc a lot, is there a written spec on what
> the heck is objc++?
Not really. There's certainly nothing formal like an ISO standard.
It essentially comes down to the set of documents published by Apple.
There are probably some links on gcc.gnu.org under the Readings section;
if they're not sufficient, then pester the ObjC++ crowd to submit patches.
--
"It won't be any more frightening than the time
I climbed up an elevator shaft with my teeth."
- Sunny Baudelaire
- Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0?, (continued)
- Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0?, Geoffrey Keating, 2004/11/18
- Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0?, Gregory John Casamento, 2004/11/18
- Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0?, Ziemowit Laski, 2004/11/18
- Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0?, Rogelio Serrano, 2004/11/18
- Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0?, Helge Hess, 2004/11/18
- Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0?, Gregory John Casamento, 2004/11/18
- Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0?, Matt Austern, 2004/11/19
- Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0?, Ziemowit Laski, 2004/11/19
- Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0?, Phil Edwards, 2004/11/19
- Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0?, Chuck Robey, 2004/11/21
- Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0?,
Phil Edwards <=
- Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0?, Dale Johannesen, 2004/11/19
- Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0?, Dan Grillo, 2004/11/19
Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0?, Richard Kenner, 2004/11/19