[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: backart - default backend?
From: |
Pete French |
Subject: |
Re: backart - default backend? |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Feb 2005 15:38:21 +0000 |
> What I really ask is, what does art gives me? Let's revert the
> question :)
> I don't care for aa... and I know that it handles some image compositing
> stuff better than xlib.
For me it's pictures and text that it does a lot better. The app I
have been in the process of porting over a long time uses a lot of
post-script based drawing into windows, including text, and this all
works a lot nicer under art.
I also find the fonts a lot easier than with X - if I need a font I just
drop it into the fonts directory and there it is. Just like it was under
NextStep. I can take any old ont off the web, wrap it as an nfont and
use it. I still can work out how fonts under X11 are supposed to work so
this is a big win for me. Especially as I need multi-lingual fonts
and I still ahvent persuaded X to do that.
but if you don;t have any need for ewither of those then Xlib has no
significant disadvantages. But I cant think of anything which Xlib does
better than art.
-bat.
- Re: backart - default backend?, (continued)
- Re: backart - default backend?, MJ Ray, 2005/02/15
- Re: backart - default backend?, MJ Ray, 2005/02/16
- Message not available
- EWMH, WWW/apps and reasons to migrate, was: backart - default backend?, MJ Ray, 2005/02/17
- Re: EWMH, WWW/apps and reasons to migrate, was: backart - default backend?, Adam Fedor, 2005/02/17
- Re: EWMH, WWW/apps and reasons to migrate, was: backart - default backend?, Banlu Kemiyatorn, 2005/02/18
- Message not available
- Re: EWMH, WWW/apps and reasons to migrate, was: backart - default backend?, MJ Ray, 2005/02/18