Just Curious... Why not an Obj-C runtime in the Dot NET or Dot GNU Commo

discuss-gnustep

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Just Curious... Why not an Obj-C runtime in the Dot NET or Dot GNU Commo

From:	thisguyisi
Subject:	Just Curious... Why not an Obj-C runtime in the Dot NET or Dot GNU Common Language Runtimes?
Date:	Sun, 20 Feb 2005 21:15:14 -0800
User-agent:	Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913)

What does the list think about this? Would it be the Yellow-Box we'vedreamed of? Windows-native widgets with Objective-C asthe-little-engine-that-could?


Just had a randumb thought and decided to share,

-thisguyisi

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

Just Curious... Why not an Obj-C runtime in the Dot NET or Dot GNU Common Language Runtimes?, thisguyisi <=
- Re: Just Curious... Why not an Obj-C runtime in the Dot NET or Dot GNU Common Language Runtimes?, Helge Hess, 2005/02/21
  - Re: Just Curious... Why not an Obj-C runtime in the Dot NET or Dot GNU Common Language Runtimes?, thisguyisi, 2005/02/23
  - Re: Just Curious... Why not an Obj-C runtime in the Dot NET or Dot GNU Common Language Runtimes?, Quentin Mathé, 2005/02/24
    - Re: Just Curious... Why not an Obj-C runtime in the Dot NET or Dot GNU Common Language Runtimes?, Helge Hess, 2005/02/24
    - Re: Just Curious... Why not an Obj-C runtime in the Dot NET or Dot GNU Common Language Runtimes?, Quentin Mathé, 2005/02/24
    - Re: Just Curious... Why not an Obj-C runtime in the Dot NET or Dot GNU Common Language Runtimes?, Banlu Kemiyatorn, 2005/02/25
    - Re: Just Curious... Why not an Obj-C runtime in the Dot NET or Dot GNU Common Language Runtimes?, Sébastien Pierre, 2005/02/25

Prev by Date: Re: Look and Feel
Next by Date: Placement of widgets
Previous by thread: [ANN]: GNU Smalltalk-ObjC Bridge
Next by thread: Re: Just Curious... Why not an Obj-C runtime in the Dot NET or Dot GNU Common Language Runtimes?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread