Re: reinventing frameworks in gnu toolchain

[Rogelio M . Serrano Jr .]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2005-02-26 15:24:39 +0800 John Davidorff Pell <johnpell@mac.com>
wrote:

> I'm sorry, I am not entirely certain of what frameworks you are 
> referring to. 
> I assume you mean frameworks in GCC/ld ala Apple's Mac OS X?
>
> If so, then patches for gcc (at least) are available to anybody with 
> a free 
> account and who agrees to the ASPL (if accessing ASPL sources) at 
> developer.apple.com (click on Darwin). For the latest, look for the 
> Darwin 
> WWDC 2004 Preview sources.
>
> I think that as and ld on Darwin are based (at some point in the 
> past) upon 
> the GNU toolchain's, so you might try checking those out as well.
>
> JP
[snipped...]

Yes im referring to framework bundles. I have already cleaned up the
gcc framework support. Im working on binutils now. I think the glibc
and uclibc dynamic loaders are the biggest problem. It cant find the
libraries in the framework directories unless I use absolute paths. It
just worked by accident actually. Right now im just using a hack to -l
and -L options. Not much of an improvement over the rpath trick I used
before.

- --
Got Sharapova?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using the GPG bundle for GNUMail

iD8DBQFCICdNyihxuQOYt8wRAilzAJwKqRPXlNW1xYsF+i21Ft27QjLx/wCfXyn/
HtRcVthaqUJ/IWqq74177v0=
=7J5/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----