[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Licensing Issues
From: |
Marc Brünink |
Subject: |
Re: Licensing Issues |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Feb 2005 09:11:01 +0100 |
On Sunday, February 27, 2005, at 01:28 AM, Frederico Muñoz wrote:
On 2005-02-26 19:28:29 +0000 Matthew D Swank <akopa@comcast.net> wrote:
(...)
This is slightly of topic, but I am writing an original wrapper for
PCRE. I
am willing to assign copyright to the FSF, but PCRE itself has a
different
license (BSD) would my framework be a candidate for inclusion in
GNUstep?
I'm not an expert, but is that BSD licence is the one without the
advertisement clause the it is GPL compatible, and furthermore it can
be changed to GPL by anyone, i.e. if you make a slight modification of
PCRE you can release the entire code as GPL.
Actually you don't have to modificate BSD licensed code to change the
license. Everyone can grab the code, put her own license on top of it
(in fact its a modification), run away, and make billions of dollars.
So you can licence your framework using the GPL and assign the
copyright to the FSF at will.
Just a short clarification: You can write your wrapper, license it
under GPL, assign the copyright to the FSF, even change the license of
the BSD licensed code, but you cannot change the copyright of the
original BSD licensed code without permission of the author.
At least thus I understood the BSD license.
Marc