Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration

[Rogelio M. Serrano Jr.]

On 2005-10-13 18:18:37 +0800 MJ Ray <mjr@phonecoop.coop> wrote:

[snipped...]
> The drawbacks of SVN remain:
> * non-distributed (same as CVS)
> * incompatible with the git-using tools (same as CVS)
> * poor library licence limits integration
> * client at least fivefold more disk, probably bigger in memory too
> * not supported at savannah
> * reconfigure everything now, only to move again soon
>
> ...and that's all obvious before use. Once in use, other quirks
> and limitations become obvious. Can't we do better?


I just started studying git and im really impressed. I like it more 
than arch now and im converting to git. I would like to convert 
gnustep to git instead. but thats just me.

I was thinking that we can make projectcenter work with git in the 
future.