|
From: | Rogelio M. Serrano Jr. |
Subject: | Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration |
Date: | Thu, 13 Oct 2005 22:50:31 +0800 |
On 2005-10-13 18:18:37 +0800 MJ Ray <mjr@phonecoop.coop> wrote: [snipped...]
The drawbacks of SVN remain: * non-distributed (same as CVS) * incompatible with the git-using tools (same as CVS) * poor library licence limits integration * client at least fivefold more disk, probably bigger in memory too * not supported at savannah * reconfigure everything now, only to move again soon ...and that's all obvious before use. Once in use, other quirks and limitations become obvious. Can't we do better?
I just started studying git and im really impressed. I like it more than arch now and im converting to git. I would like to convert gnustep to git instead. but thats just me.
I was thinking that we can make projectcenter work with git in the future.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |