Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration

[Quentin Mathé]

Le 19 oct. 05 à 04:17, Helge Hess a écrit :

> Given the feedback of Richard, Wim, Rogelio the proposal seems to  
> be dropped. The "6 months" timeout mentioned by some seems to be a  
> rather ridiculous "excuse" to me since in this timeframe the  
> systems _definitely_ won't change in any noticable way.
> Apparently the core developers are fine with CVS - which is rather  
> surprising to me, but needs to be accepted.

I'm not a real core developer, but I would like to say I'm not fine  
with CVS, development without easy branching is currently a pain, I  
would be very happy to move to Subversion, especially when you  
consider decentralized possibilities offered by SVK.

> The primary thing I would have hoped for are branches which might  
> not directly reflect the "regligious GNUstep path", eg branches  
> which support FHS. IMHO this would have been much easier with Svn  
> and definitely won't happen as CVS branches.

True.

Quentin.

--
Quentin Mathé
qmathe@club-internet.fr