[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [OT, Q] Fast RPC library?
From: |
Helge Hess |
Subject: |
Re: [OT, Q] Fast RPC library? |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Oct 2005 00:54:41 +0200 |
On 23. Okt 2005, at 12:14 Uhr, Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:
One option, if you trust the clients to generate the valid xml, is
to write your own extremely simplified xml parser.
Well, but then, what would be the point in using XML-RPC? The only
real gain you have is the implicit advantages of using a standard
which implies that you have to deal with all the stuff attached.
What I can imagine is that pure HTTP with some custom XML format
might be an option. With a proper HTTP/1.1 library which is
supporting keep-alive and pipelining, one might get the requested
amount of RPCs/s while still having a scalable and standards
compliant base.
But then, this is not nearly as easy to implement as a simple HTTP/
1.0 server.
Actually I wonder _why_ you want to replace your existing system if
that works?
The GNUstep SQLClient library (in the dev-libs directory) contains
the WebServer class
Why the heck do you put a webserver class into a SQL library?! ;-)
Greets,
Helge
--
http://docs.opengroupware.org/Members/helge/
OpenGroupware.org
- [OT, Q] Fast RPC library?, Sungjin Chun, 2005/10/22
- Re: [OT, Q] Fast RPC library?, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2005/10/22
- Re: [OT, Q] Fast RPC library?, Helge Hess, 2005/10/22
- Re: [OT, Q] Fast RPC library?, Sungjin Chun, 2005/10/22
- Re: [OT, Q] Fast RPC library?, Sungjin Chun, 2005/10/22
- Re: [OT, Q] Fast RPC library?, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2005/10/23
- Re: [OT, Q] Fast RPC library?, Sungjin Chun, 2005/10/23
- Re: [OT, Q] Fast RPC library?, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2005/10/23
- Re: [OT, Q] Fast RPC library?,
Helge Hess <=
- Re: [OT, Q] Fast RPC library?, Sungjin Chun, 2005/10/23
- Re: [OT, Q] Fast RPC library?, Helge Hess, 2005/10/24
- Re: [OT, Q] Fast RPC library?, Sungjin Chun, 2005/10/24
- Re: [OT, Q] Fast RPC library?, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2005/10/24