Re: Cocotron

[Gregory John Casamento]

I realize it's not their fault.   *WE* need to start getting the message out 
better, among other things.
 
--
Gregory Casamento
## GNUstep Chief Maintainer

----- Original Message ----
From: Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf <lars.sonchocky-helldorf@hamburg.de>
To: Gregory John Casamento <greg_casamento@yahoo.com>
Cc: "hns@computer.org" <hns@computer.org>; discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2006 8:37:57 PM
Subject: Re: Cocotron


Am 28.12.2006 um 17:37 schrieb Gregory John Casamento:

> Nikolaus,
>
> They would be wrong.   GNUstep not an OS.

They might be wrong, but it's not their fault. If we want people to  
get it right we'll have to explain it to them in a catchy way - even  
if that might include to rename gnustep-base to gnustep-foundation  
and gnustep-gui to gnustep-appkit.

>
> http://www.gnustep.org/information/aboutGNUstep.html
>
> Later, GJC

regards, Lars

> --
> Gregory Casamento
> ## GNUstep Chief Maintainer
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: "hns@computer.org" <hns@computer.org>
> To: discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
> Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2006 8:56:28 AM
> Subject: Re: Cocotron
>
>
> hns@computer.org schrieb:
>
>> In my experience (from other discussuions about GNUstep and even with
>> my mySTEP project), I think the reasons are manifold. What I have
>> collected is:
>
> Another one just appeared in a German Cocoa developer discussion:
>
> * GNUstep is an incomplete operating system and not a GUI framework -
> people simply do not associate "GUI" with "AppKit" and "Base" with
> "Foundation" and therefore not "GNUstep" with "Cocoa".
>
> Nikolaus
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnustep mailing list
> Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnustep mailing list
> Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep