[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: FOSDEM and beyond (next stable release of base)

From: Riccardo Mottola
Subject: Re: FOSDEM and beyond (next stable release of base)
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 23:58:06 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv: Gecko/20100109 SeaMonkey/2.0.1

Maybe we could have a<GNUstep/GNUstep.h>, which is like<Cocoa/Cocoa.h>  but 
also includes base and GUI additions?  Having a single header like this can improve compile 
times a lot if we use precompiled headers.  With a current version of GNUstep:
Why that? Cocoa/Cocoa.h is something so stupid I never understood. I bet it started out as more a marketing gag in 10.0 days! I never use it any appplicaiton. At most Foundation.h and AppKit.h
Or better, fine-grained imports.

GNUstep.h is very convenient currently because it canbe included in applications to provide comaptibility macros when porting software from gnustep to Mac.

you would end up having:
Foundation.h + AppKit.h
Cocoa.h for mac compatibility
GNUstepAdditions.h header possibly...

do we need need cocoa+gsadditions really?


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]