discuss-gnustep
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: State of the 'Step


From: Fred Kiefer
Subject: Re: State of the 'Step
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 10:19:02 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; de; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091130 SUSE/3.0.0-1.1.1 Thunderbird/3.0

I wrote a mail on this just a few days ago :-(

Having a GNUstep converter in the OpenSuse build system would not just
give us packages for OpenSuse but for many other Linux systems out there
and as I understand it this is a one off effort. Richard Stonehouse
already has the core libraries in there, what we need for all the other
GNUstep applications is that converter from the GNUstep make file to
package descriptors and this shouldn't be to hard.
Perhaps there are similar mechanisms for other systems as well. The
OpenSuse one just happened to be discussed during FOSDEM.

Fred


Am 15.02.2010 22:26, schrieb Gregory Casamento:
> You're preaching to the choir here on this one.  Any ideas how to
> make that happen?   I would love to get up to date packages
> everywhere.
> 
> Thanks, GC
> 
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 3:39 AM, Ronald C.F. Antony
> <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Even more to the point: unless there are simple GnuStep
>> meta-packages for the major BSD and Linux distributions that are
>> reasonable "click-install-run" easy, most of the effort going into
>> GNUStep is wasted, because except for a few nostalgic exNeXT users
>> and a few developers, nobody is going to use it. I didn't have time
>> to play with GNUStep for ages, but I keep following the development
>> from a distance, but think about it for a moment: if KDE or
>> something like it would require that level of involvement just to
>> get going, do you think it would have the sort of adoption it has
>> now?
>> 
>> Ronald
>> 
>> On 14 Feb 2010, at 16:34, Fred Kiefer wrote:
>> 
>>> Great to hear how much GNUstep software you are using. But being
>>> a developer I am most interested in what didn't work :-( Why did
>>> you have to abandon your attempt to compile GNUstep from SVN? (We
>>> switched over from CVS years ago, if you really tried CVS then
>>> this was a very old version of GNUstep)
>>> 
>>> And are there any interesting patches on the debian patch system
>>> for GNUstep that didn't make it upstream?





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]