[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Building Performance

From: artware
Subject: Re: Building Performance
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 00:55:52 -0500


That worked like a charm! Thanks so much for committing the change.


On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 12:32 AM, Richard Frith-Macdonald
<address@hidden> wrote:

> The class is explicitly designed and documented as not allowing additional 
> instance variables in subclasses, so it doesn't matter that it's size is not 
> theoretically not constant ... the compiler is complaining abut something 
> that doesn't happen.  However, it may be that there's no way to tell that 
> compiler to carry on and ignore this.
> I'm not really familiar with clang/llvm, but perhaps there's a flag to tell 
> it to treat this as a warning (it's a perfectly reasonable warning) rather 
> than as an error?
> Alternatively, you can use gcc as your compiler :-)
> That being said, I've committed a small change to try to avoid this warning 
> (though I haven't tested it as I don't have clang/llvm installed).

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]