|Subject:||Re: Doxygen documentation|
|Date:||Wed, 21 Sep 2011 23:52:15 +0200|
|User-agent:||Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X 10.4; en-US; rv:126.96.36.199) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14|
Well, i also think that projects gravitating around gnustep.org should use all the same document generator. Thus I think using autogsdoc is a good thing for other projects too and that is what I use and recommend for all GAP projects.And the reason I brought this up is because I'm starting to document corebase. Seeing as I'm starting from scratch I'm having a serious look at which doc generator to use. It would probably be a quite large effort move all of current gnustep documentation to doxygen and probably something that wouldn't happen overnight, as you suggest.
it's a bit like most people use javadoc with java. It's the the standard one.
|[Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread]|