[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Debian 8 (Not really SOLVED)
From: |
David Chisnall |
Subject: |
Re: Debian 8 (Not really SOLVED) |
Date: |
Sat, 30 Jan 2016 11:05:59 +0000 |
On 29 Jan 2016, at 21:57, Svetlana A. Tkachenko <svetlana@members.fsf.org>
wrote:
>
>> From the output that Svetlana has shown me, it also looks as if the
>> Debian clang packages are no longer able to find any headers.
>
> I don't remember specifics. Do you have the output still?
If you can rerun clang -cc1 -v, it will show the header search paths. It
didn’t seem to be searching anything for you.
>
>> Actually I filed a bug report a about that a while ago [0], suggesting to
>> drop the dependency to a recommendation, but unfortunately that didn’t
>> elicit a response yet.
>
> Would we want to keep gnustep packages in both incarnations (GCC (the
> existing one) as well as clang). Since some users will probably still
> want the GCC version.
There is no technical reason to prefer gcc to clang for Objective-C, and I have
no intention of arguing license philosophy.
David
-- Sent from my STANTEC-ZEBRA