dolibarr-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Dolibarr-dev] About PgSQL Support and SQL standard


From: Laurent Destailleur (eldy)
Subject: Re: [Dolibarr-dev] About PgSQL Support and SQL standard
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 22:47:52 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130308 Thunderbird/17.0.4

Le 25/04/2013 17:21, Marcos García a écrit :
I think it would be nice that we use Dolibarr with Doctrine or any ORM so that way we won't have compatibility problems with different database drivers...


What do you think?

Dolibarr already has its own abstract database driver.
And this abstract layer is really better than doctrine and any other orm. We already test all of them and they were not enough powerfull to match dolibarr quality, so we develop ours.
For exemple,
- Abstraction for error report differs according to dabase. System works for all database but they return error code of database and not value differs.
- Doctrime, like other ORM does not support imbricated level of transaction
- Doctrine like other CRM does not allow to make a difference between ddl and dml. And this is required to be able to manage upgrade process.
- Doctrine like other CRM support select, update, delete and insert but few of them support instruction to manage foreign key creation, or support is not working correctly.

The problem of Florian is not a problem of ORM. It is just that request are not correctly written by developer. So we have to fix this into core code.
We recommand to develop using Postgresql, as when it works with postgres, it works with mysql but not the oposite.


Regards,

 
Marcos García
address@hidden


2013/4/25 Florian Henry <address@hidden>
Dear developpers,

        I'm currently experiement lot's of problem with PostgreSQL only due to non SQL respect standard.

        As reminder with an agregate SQL function you must put in GROUP BY all field that are not in the agreate

        For example :   SELECT t.name,t.id, SUM(t.cost) FROM llx_table GROUP BY t.id
            That's WRONG ! MySQL let it go, but PgSQL no !

        Correct version is SELECT t.name,t.id, SUM(t.cost) FROM llx_table GROUP BY t.name,t.id

        This kind of problem cannot be detected by UnitTest because most of the time the are on list, not in object method, but in list SQL.

        Other common problem is into insert or update method
        If your field is an integer, you must have this to build the request :
             $sql.= " ".(! empty($this->fk_fourn)?"'".$this->fk_fourn."'":"null");
        and NOT
            $sql.= " '".(! empty($this->fk_fourn)?$this->fk_fourn:"null")."'";

        Try to sent update or insert request UPDATE llx_table SET fk_fourn='' WHERE ... in PgSQL it will say '' is not a valid inter, and is right.
        Once again MySQL let it go but insert 0 instead of NULL....


Regards
-- 
Florian HENRY
address@hidden
+33 6 03 76 48 07
http://www.open-concept.pro
Twitter : @_Open_Concept_

_______________________________________________
Dolibarr-dev mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dolibarr-dev




_______________________________________________
Dolibarr-dev mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dolibarr-dev


-- 
Eldy (Laurent Destailleur).

EMail: address@hidden
Web: http://www.destailleur.fr

Dolibarr (Project leader): http://www.dolibarr.org
To make a donation for Dolibarr project via Paypal: address@hidden
AWStats (Author) : http://awstats.sourceforge.net
To make a donation for AWStats project via Paypal: address@hidden
AWBot (Author) : http://awbot.sourceforge.net
CVSChangeLogBuilder (Author) : http://cvschangelogb.sourceforge.net

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]