[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Auth]Re: DotGNU reference
From: |
S11001001 |
Subject: |
[Auth]Re: DotGNU reference |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Aug 2002 09:19:13 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1b) Gecko/20020812 |
Adam Theo wrote:
I found this refernce to DotGNU, specifically its Virtual Identities
effort:
http://java.sun.com/features/2002/05/single-signon.html
I think they got it wrong, though. They are saying DotGNU's Single
Sign-On mechanism (does it have one yet?) is a third-party security
service like Passport and XNS. In other words a centralized service that
manages all assertions for everyone. This is in contrast to the Liberty
Alliance way of a group (or federation) of organizations that get
together and share between each other, after forming bonds of trust.
Well, "third party security service" is not necessarily centralized, and
does include LA. The only difference between LA and Passport et al is
that LA is multi-vendor. However, "DotGNU security service" is only an
interoperability & outside interface standard. FrePort and MACS are auth
systems. DotGNU will never have its own SSO; SSO is a function of the
auth plugins (not to be confused with runtime/VM plugins to SEE ;)
Look at some other articles by Jon Byous; he's a real company man.
Anything written by him should be taken with that in mind. Not that it
would be natural to read other stuff by him.... :)
--
Stephen Compall
DotGNU `Contributor' -- http://dotgnu.org
Free Software is all about dignity. This dignity is what makes the
whole thing different. It changes the relationship from subservient
user and all-powerful creator (even if you're a developer) to an
egalitarian relationship.
-- Barry Fitzgerald
- [Auth]Re: DotGNU reference,
S11001001 <=