[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]This Week on the DotGNU mailing list - 8
From: |
Gopal.V |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]This Week on the DotGNU mailing list - 8 |
Date: |
Sat, 8 Dec 2001 21:35:07 +0530 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
Hi,
> b) A Java front-end for the Portable.NET compiler (to be
> implemented in C). (Bradley, you expressed interest in
> this... are you able to take this on, or is the FSF keeping
> you too busy?)
What do you mean by this ? . A Java plugin to cscc ?
> c) A webservice-based application that will become popular
> quickly. A file-sharing app (like I proposed recently)
> would be a good choice IMHO.
I would like to clarify a few doubts here. What is the
actual specifications of the file-sharing app.
- should it be P2P ?
- anonymity vs Identity ?
+---Gnutella |
`---Freenet `----uServ
- locator specified like uServ ?
`---eg the ``gopal.<somewhere>.<something>'' locator
- name searchable like Gnutella/Freenet ?
`---eg look for a shared file with name ``GNU''
- How content replication should take place
+-- Freenet & uServ does this automagically
| | `-- ?
| `--cache mode replication
`- Gnutella does not have this feature
- Reliability of Service
+--Gnutella
| ``GOOD''
+--Freenet
| ``SACRIFICED FOR ANONYMITY''
`--uServ
``????''
- Who provides the first static peer ?
- What happens to the app if uServ is GPL'd ? ;)
In the end I would like to mention that I myself am confused about
the features needed. The above ``diagram'' was a hash of ideas about how
the existing ideas in file-sharing & a bit of my own. As far as I could
see we need a fork of Freenet code excluding the anonymity part.
Gopal.V
--
The difference between insanity and genius is only measured by success
//===<=>===\\
|| GNU RULEZ ||
\\===<=>===//