[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
"Who-is-who"?...Who is "Who-is-who"? (was Re: [DotGNU]Project informatio
"Who-is-who"?...Who is "Who-is-who"? (was Re: [DotGNU]Project information)
Tue, 11 Jun 2002 17:41:36 -0500
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1a) Gecko/20020608
Peter Minten wrote:
I've started with the Who-Is-Who document, currently there are 3 entries
(current file is attached to this e-mail). I need a lot more. So if you
do anything useful in this project please send a WIW card.
An other thing is the State of the DotGNU Union. For the SotDU I need to
know what projects have done in the last period and where they are now.
So please send me this information.
I currently have a WIW count of 5. Please help me improve that :-).
It really depends. Exactly who belongs in the WIW? i.e., I wouldn't
presume that I'm important enough to be in the WIW, and I think that
some here might share that feeling. Certainly in some cases it's obvious
DotGNU `Contributor' -- http://www.dotgnu.org
My views about copyright take an hour to expound, but one general
principle applies: it cannot justify denying the public important
freedoms. As Abraham Lincoln put it, "Whenever there is a conflict
between human rights and property rights, human rights must prevail."
Property rights are meant to advance human well-being, not as an
excuse to disregard it.
-- RMS, "The GNU GPL and the American Way"
- [DotGNU]Project information, Peter Minten, 2002/06/11
- "Who-is-who"?...Who is "Who-is-who"? (was Re: [DotGNU]Project information),