[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: How portable is it ? (was: [DotGNU]Embedding Portable.NET)
From: |
Gopal V |
Subject: |
Re: How portable is it ? (was: [DotGNU]Embedding Portable.NET) |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Jun 2002 16:09:41 +0530 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
If memory serves me right, Erik van der Poel wrote:
> Mozilla's Tinderbox seems to be available:
>
> http://lxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/webtools/
>
> This might serve as a starting point.
That is an accountability tool .... (when you have more than 10
... explosion ....) . Since we don't have 10 people (scarcely 2)
on the VM/Compiler side of business , I don't think we can use
Tinderbox ..... and also it needs Bonsai .. etc ......
I don't want to see
"rhys" --- green --- green -- ......
"rhys" --- green --- green -- ......
"rhys" --- green --- green -- ......
"rhys" --- green --- green -- ......
That reduces motivation to actually check this thing ;)
The ideal solution is distribute the work load as rhys has done here.
Also the Tinderbox is an effort to place the blame on the erring
developer in a bunch of developers .....
But once we have more that one developer on the compiler/vm regularly
we could think of a Tinderbox.
Anyway thanks for the suggestion. (caused me to take a closer look at
lxr,bonsai and tinderbox)
Gopal
--
The difference between insanity and genius is measured by success