[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]Status of cscc and Qt#
|
From: |
Gopal V |
|
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]Status of cscc and Qt# |
|
Date: |
Thu, 7 Nov 2002 00:06:06 +0530 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
If memory serves me right, Gopal V wrote:
> In that case , as subclass check is needed (see IsSubClass in verify.c).
> Which means it takes no time to solve at all ;-)
Anyway, that fixed in CVS ... we'll rethink if it breaks the spec :-)
--
sh... be very, very quiet . I'm hunting bugs.
- [DotGNU]Status of cscc and Qt#, Adam Treat, 2002/11/05
- Re: [DotGNU]Status of cscc and Qt#, Adam Treat, 2002/11/05
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: [DotGNU]Status of cscc and Qt#, Adam Treat, 2002/11/06
- Re: [DotGNU]Status of cscc and Qt#, Adam Treat, 2002/11/06
- Re: [DotGNU]Status of cscc and Qt#, Rhys Weatherley, 2002/11/06
- Re: [DotGNU]Status of cscc and Qt#, Adam Treat, 2002/11/06
- [DotGNU]The Intended usage of GNU software (was Treecc Ruby support), James Michael DuPont, 2002/11/06
- [DotGNU]Re: The Intended usage of GNU software (was Treecc Ruby support), Rhys Weatherley, 2002/11/06
- [DotGNU]Re: The Intended usage of GNU software (was Treecc Ruby support), James Michael DuPont, 2002/11/06
- Re: [DotGNU]Status of cscc and Qt#, Gopal V, 2002/11/06
- Re: [DotGNU]Status of cscc and Qt#,
Gopal V <=
- Re: [DotGNU]Status of cscc and Qt#, Adam Treat, 2002/11/06
- Re: [DotGNU]Status of cscc and Qt#, Rhys Weatherley, 2002/11/06
- Re: [DotGNU]Status of cscc and Qt#, Rhys Weatherley, 2002/11/06
- Re: [DotGNU]Status of cscc and Qt#, Adam Treat, 2002/11/06
- Re: [DotGNU]Status of cscc and Qt#, Rhys Weatherley, 2002/11/06