[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]Could someone test this on all platforms ?
From: |
Gopal V |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]Could someone test this on all platforms ? |
Date: |
Fri, 7 Feb 2003 19:39:02 +0530 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
If memory serves me right, Paolo Molaro wrote:
> I guess in the computer science courses they don't teach how measuring is
> supposed to be done? ;-)
We're mostly taught that there are "lies , damned lies and stastics"
and told to extrapolate that theory to benchmarks and release dates ;-).
> 1) the first DateTime.Now call will make the jit compile lots of methods
> (initialization of some types and so on).
Hmm...This also applies for ilrun (CVM conversion, unrolling, inlining) ?.
> 2) the Millisecond property has, well, a millisecond resolution:-)
Well that's obtained after the two DateTime.Now calls.. So that should
not interfere .
> I just added a "t1=DateTime.Now;" before the loop and increased the
> number of iterations to 10240000. Results are below:
Hmm.. I was comparing the performance of x86 unrolled ilrun doing the
FooBar.Test() and full JIT doing FooBar.Test() .. When I got a higher
speed for the simpler ilrun , I added 1024 runs to balance out any
effects of conversion.
This looks a lot like the code I'm working on , where a for loop over
the entries checking for true vs false ... (it now has ~7000 iterations,
but 1024 was a decent approximation).
> about two times slower than mono in your test.
hehe, after you doctored it to give that :) ....
I was just playing around with the unroller when I checked this . This
was a simpler case to check whether my computer had gone haywire . My
comparison led to the last mail.
Well, let's get back to work ...
Gopal
--
The difference between insanity and genius is measured by success
- [DotGNU]Could someone test this on all platforms ?, Gopal V, 2003/02/06
- RE: [DotGNU]Could someone test this on all platforms ?, Aditya P. Bansod, 2003/02/06
- RE: [DotGNU]Could someone test this on all platforms ?, Aditya P. Bansod, 2003/02/06
- Re: [DotGNU]Could someone test this on all platforms ?, Gopal V, 2003/02/07
- Re: [DotGNU]Could someone test this on all platforms ?, Paolo Molaro, 2003/02/07
- Re: [DotGNU]Could someone test this on all platforms ?,
Gopal V <=
- Re: [DotGNU]Could someone test this on all platforms ?, Paolo Molaro, 2003/02/07
- Re: [DotGNU]Could someone test this on all platforms ?, Gopal V, 2003/02/07
- Re: [DotGNU]Could someone test this on all platforms ?, Rhys Weatherley, 2003/02/07
- Re: [DotGNU]Could someone test this on all platforms ?, Paolo Molaro, 2003/02/08
- Re: [DotGNU]Could someone test this on all platforms ?, Rhys Weatherley, 2003/02/08
- Re: [DotGNU]Could someone test this on all platforms ?, Paolo Molaro, 2003/02/09
- Re: [DotGNU]Could someone test this on all platforms ?, Fergus Henderson, 2003/02/09
- Re: [DotGNU]Could someone test this on all platforms ?, Rhys Weatherley, 2003/02/09
Re: [DotGNU]Could someone test this on all platforms ?, Ian Game, 2003/02/06
Re: [DotGNU]Could someone test this on all platforms ?, CH Gowri Kumar, 2003/02/07