dotgnu-general
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[DotGNU]Correction Re: MS Office 2003 XML patented


From: Seth Johnson
Subject: [DotGNU]Correction Re: MS Office 2003 XML patented
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 23:51:41 -0500

Before this goes any further, let me say that I seem to have misread the
original message.

The language is interesting, but the phrasing mentioning the GPL is,
apparently Carsten's analysis, not the actual language.

Seth Johnson

Seth Johnson wrote:
> 
> Does anybody have a copy of this page saved, or in their cache?  The
> language in question appears to no longer be there.
> 
> Seth
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bernard Lang <address@hidden>
> Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 13:42:53 +0100
> Subject: Re: [Patents] MS Office 2003 XML patented
> 
> do you have a coppy of that page ...
> 
> it does not seem to exist any longer.
> 
> Bernard
> 
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 01:48:11PM +0100, Carsten Svaneborg wrote:
> > Hi! Just came across the following:
> >
> > http://www.microsoft.com/mscorp/ip/format/xmlpatentlicense.asp
> > Office 2003 XML Reference Schema Patent License
> >
> > Microsoft may have patents and/or patent applications that are
> necessary
> > for you to license in order to make, sell, or distribute software
> programs
> > that read or write files that comply with the Microsoft
> specifications for
> > the Office Schemas.
> >
> > So usage of MS Word XML files requires a patentlicense.
> >
> > :
> >
> > You are not licensed to distribute a Licensed Implementation under
> license
> > terms and conditions that prohibit the terms and conditions of this
> license.
> > You are not licensed to sublicense or transfer your rights.
> >
> > The licence is royalty free, but GPL ยง7 requires the right to
> sublicence
> > patent rights to the people who obtain a GPL program from you.
> >
> > so in other words Microsoft is using patents to prevent GPLed
> programs
> > from accessing the XML format that MS Word will be using.
> >
> > This is very good timing, and goes to show how important it is to
> ensure
> > that the software patent directive has articles that protects
> interoperativity
> > from consituting patentinfringemet.
> >
> > --
> >   Mvh. Carsten Svaneborg
> > http://www.softwarepatenter.dk
> >
> >
> 
> --
>          Non aux Brevets Logiciels  -  No to Software Patents
>            SIGNEZ    http://petition.eurolinux.org/    SIGN
> 
> address@hidden             ,_  /\o    \o/    Tel  +33 1 3963
> 5644
> http://pauillac.inria.fr/~lang/  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^  Fax  +33 1 3963
> 5469
>             INRIA / B.P. 105 / 78153 Le Chesnay CEDEX / France
>          Je n'exprime que mon opinion - I express only my opinion
>                  CAGED BEHIND WINDOWS or FREE WITH LINUX
> 
> C-FIT Community Discussion List
> List Parent: address@hidden
> C-FIT Home:  http://RealMeasures.dyndns.org/C-FIT
> 
> To Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Send "[Un]Subscribe C-FIT_Community" To address@hidden

-- 

DRM is Theft!  We are the Stakeholders!

New Yorkers for Fair Use
http://www.nyfairuse.org

[CC] Counter-copyright: http://realmeasures.dyndns.org/cc

I reserve no rights restricting copying, modification or distribution of
this incidentally recorded communication.  Original authorship should be
attributed reasonably, but only so far as such an expectation might hold for
usual practice in ordinary social discourse to which one holds no claim of
exclusive rights.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]