dotgnu-pnet
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Pnet-developers] [bugs #6927] More functions pointers problems


From: Rhys Weatherley
Subject: [Pnet-developers] [bugs #6927] More functions pointers problems
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 16:58:39 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826

This mail is an automated notification from the bugs tracker
 of the project: DotGNU Portable.NET.

/**************************************************************************/
[bugs #6927] Latest Modifications:

Changes by: 
                Rhys Weatherley <address@hidden>
'Date: 
                Tue 12/02/2003 at 21:58 (GMT)

            What     | Removed                   | Added
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Resolution | None                      | Invalid
              Status | Open                      | Closed


------------------ Additional Follow-up Comments ----------------------------
Bug submission from banned contributor.  Closed without
considering it as per previously stated policy.

Seriously Michael, if you can't figure out how to fix
the above trivial syntax issue and submit a patch, we don't 
want you here (it's a one-liner in the grammar).






/**************************************************************************/
[bugs #6927] Full Item Snapshot:

URL: <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=6927>
Project: DotGNU Portable.NET
Submitted by: James Michael DuPont
On: Tue 12/02/2003 at 18:40

Category:  None
Severity:  5 - Average
Item Group:  None
Resolution:  Invalid
Assigned to:  None
Status:  Closed


Summary:  More functions pointers problems

Original Submission:  Dear DotGnu Peoples,
i have started to use pnet/c again and have encountered some more problems with 
it. Herr are my bug reports :

typedef unsigned int size_t;
typedef int (*compare_func_t)(const void *, const void * );
void * p1;
size_t p2;
size_t p3a;
int baz( compare_func_t f);
int foo(register size_t p3);
compare_func_t a;
void sort_func_test (
                     void *,
                     size_t,
                     register size_t, // <<---- //test.c:14: syntax error, 
unexpected ',' at or near `,'
                     compare_func_t
                     );
typedef void (*sort_func_t)(
                            void *, 
                            size_t,
                            register size_t,  // <<----//test.c:20: syntax 
error, unexpected ',' at or near `,'
                            compare_func_t );


/*
Bug Report :
cscc version 0.6.1

The error message are :

test.c:12: syntax error, unexpected ',' at or near `,'
test.c:18: syntax error, unexpected ',' at or near `,'
stdin:1: syntax error, unexpected ':', expecting '{'

This compiles fine in gcc.
*/

Follow-up Comments
------------------


-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Tue 12/02/2003 at 21:58       By: rweather
Bug submission from banned contributor.  Closed without
considering it as per previously stated policy.

Seriously Michael, if you can't figure out how to fix
the above trivial syntax issue and submit a patch, we don't 
want you here (it's a one-liner in the grammar).












For detailed info, follow this link:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=6927>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]