Re: [Dotgnu-sc] Status of dotgnu.org

[David Sugar]

Yes, this is my opinion as well; we should see about getting this running on 
gnu.org and perhapse use it to archive other lists as well if we can.

On Monday 29 July 2002 01:53 pm, Bradley M. Kuhn wrote:
> Norbert Bollow <address@hidden> wrote:
> > On the other hand, I don't like the idea of moving to a vanilla Mailman
> > version, especially with the archives.  Since the beginning of DotGNU
> > we've had searchable archives, and also I've made the small modification
> > to the archives that gives us the capability to add logos and a legal
> > disclaimer to the archives.  I don't like the idea of losing these
> > features.
>
> Perhaps you could send the patches back to the mailman maintainers and
> get them into the canonical version.
>
> > So if/when we move the DotGNU lists to a FSF server, I'd like to be able
> > to admin the archiver system there - would this be possible?
>
> Actually, we don't have an archiver system.  If you could set one up for
> all our mailing lists, that would be wonderful.  What software do yo use?
>
>
>    -- bkuhn