[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Duplicity-talk] [patch] collection-status: output in more consistent or
From: |
Peter Schuller |
Subject: |
[Duplicity-talk] [patch] collection-status: output in more consistent order |
Date: |
Fri, 2 Nov 2007 18:49:59 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) |
Everytime I use collection-status my brain has a hiccup as a result of
the most recent backup being listed first, with older backups listed
later in internally latest-last order. And in both cases sets within a
chain are listed in latest-last order.
Since the normal case is that you have zero or more backup chains
without matching signatures, and then one (latest) backup chain with
matching signatures, I feel it is much more natural to print the ones
without matching signatures first. This should result in a more
natural chronological order in most typical cases.
Attached patch simply changes the order of the collection status.
--
/ Peter Schuller
PGP userID: 0xE9758B7D or 'Peter Schuller <address@hidden>'
Key retrieval: Send an E-Mail to address@hidden
E-Mail: address@hidden Web: http://www.scode.org
duplicity-colstatsreverse.patch
Description: Text Data
pgpR_42S1Ddsq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Duplicity-talk] [patch] collection-status: output in more consistent order,
Peter Schuller <=