Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: dbus patch

[Edgar Soldin]

> But, again, as an optional component, I don't see any problems with
> dbus; and when multiple processes will actually need to watch the same
> duplicity, perhaps dbus will become indispensable :)
>
> -- Dan
>   
dito .. optional should be the way to go.

as for reinventing wheels, nobody says we couldn't design the ipc
interface as close to dbus concepts as possible. On the other hand.
Aren't there established python ipc libraries / practices except of dbus?
I am really interested in a sophisticated communication with duplicity
myself.

..ede

-- 
public class WhoDidIt{ // A comment. I love comments 
  private static Person sender;

  public static void main (String[] foo){

  sender = new Person();
  sender.setName(new String[]{"Edgar", "Soldin"});

  Address address = new Address();
  address.setStreet("Stadtweg 119");
  address.setZip(39116);
  address.setCity("Magdeburg");
  address.setCountry("Germany");

  sender.setAddress(address);

  sender.setMobilePhone(" +49(0)171-2782880 ");
  sender.setWebSiteUrl(" http://www.soldin.de ");
  sender.setEmail(" address@hidden ");
  sender.setPGPPublicKey(" http://www.soldin.de/edgar_soldin.asc ");
  sender.setGender(true);

  System.out.println(sender.toString());
  }
}