[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Understanding "Aborting because you may have accide
From: |
edgar . soldin |
Subject: |
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Understanding "Aborting because you may have accidentally..." |
Date: |
Sun, 12 Dec 2010 12:56:20 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 |
Did you change duply versions between full and incr? From which to which?
Changelog for 1.5.2 states
# - added --name=duply_<profile> for duplicity 0.6.01+ to name cache folder
ede/duply.net
On 11.12.2010 23:08, address@hidden wrote:
> That does make sense.
>
> The source and destination have not changed, so something else must have. My
> suspicion is that duply might have messed something up. I recently tried
> using duply 1.5.4 (I've since reverted back to 1.5.2.3), but it gave me
> somewhat strange errors related to my GPG keys and refused to back anything
> up. Maybe that somehow caused duplicity to become confused?
>
> I guess the solution would be to use "--allow-source-mismatch" once to
> correct this problem. Is that correct?
>
> Thanks for all of the help.
> John
>
> On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Jeremy Miller <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> I actually run all my backups with the "--allow-source-mismatch"
>> switch. With the massive amount of backups I take I do not have time
>> to recreate everything sometimes if one of the backups servers fail
>> and metadata is lost. After restoring, sometimes it doesn't realize
>> it's the "same" dataset and thinks by default duplicity won't
>> overwrite and existing backup with the same name. Have you
>> reinstalled or changed your GPG keys? Some change has occurred and
>> the backup location and the backup source are no longer synced and
>> they do not know they are "related" anymore. I hope that makes sense.
>>
>> Jeremy
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 4:52 PM, address@hidden
>> <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> I am using duply + duplicity to backup my local machine.
>>>
>>> The last backup I ran was a full backup (the second full backup to my
>> backup
>>> directory). Today I am trying to run an incremental backup, but receive
>> this
>>> error instead:
>>>
>>> "Aborting because you may have accidentally tried to backup two different
>>> data sets to the same remote location, or using the same archive
>> directory.
>>> If this is not a mistake, use the --allow-source-mismatch switch to avoid
>>> seeing this message."
>>>
>>> Does anybody know what this is about? I read the manual but am still a
>> bit
>>> confused on what I am doing wrong.
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Duplicity-talk mailing list
>>> address@hidden
>>> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jeremy Miller
>> Head of Virtualization
>> Site5.com LLC
>> www.site5.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Duplicity-talk mailing list
>> address@hidden
>> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Duplicity-talk mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk
- [Duplicity-talk] Understanding "Aborting because you may have accidentally...", address@hidden, 2010/12/11
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Understanding "Aborting because you may have accidentally...", Jeremy Miller, 2010/12/11
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Understanding "Aborting because you may have accidentally...", address@hidden, 2010/12/11
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Understanding "Aborting because you may have accidentally...",
edgar . soldin <=
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Understanding "Aborting because you may have accidentally...", address@hidden, 2010/12/12
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Understanding "Aborting because you may have accidentally...", edgar . soldin, 2010/12/13
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Understanding "Aborting because you may have accidentally...", address@hidden, 2010/12/13
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Understanding "Aborting because you may have accidentally...", edgar . soldin, 2010/12/14
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Understanding "Aborting because you may have accidentally...", address@hidden, 2010/12/14
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Understanding "Aborting because you may have accidentally...", Ian Barton, 2010/12/12