[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Duplicity-talk] duplicity 0.6.12 / AssertionError during incrementa
From: |
edgar . soldin |
Subject: |
Re: [Duplicity-talk] duplicity 0.6.12 / AssertionError during incremental backup |
Date: |
Sat, 02 Jul 2011 14:32:29 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0 |
i don't use imap either, but i would start by making this error talkative,
explaining in the message what's the issue and how to probably get rid of it.
as there was no data loss, i don't really take that very seriously. my educated
guess would be resuming gone wrong. we could check for that. but currently i
can only offer to insert the error message.
i'd rather take care of the 'backup without private key' issue that is still
open. and even therefor i can't seem to find the time.
ede/duply.net
On 02.07.2011 01:57, Kenneth Loafman wrote:
> Not sure where the problem is, imapbackend, or earlier. If earlier, it could
> be a serious issue, so yes, let's try to figure out what happened. The
> problem is that I don't have a way to test imapbackend.
>
> ...Ken
>
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 6:09 PM, <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>>
> wrote:
>
> was only talking about this one, because we encountered it now ;) .. will
> you, should i, anybody wants to step forward to turn it into a proper error?
>
> ede/duply.net <http://duply.net>
>
> On 01.07.2011 20:58, Kenneth Loafman wrote:
> > Yes. Been trying to replace them as I encounter them.
> >
> > Problem is that, at present, there are 186 of them in the distributed
> code. Major work.
> >
> > ...Ken
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 12:01 PM, <address@hidden
> <mailto:address@hidden> <mailto:address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>>>
> wrote:
> >
> > still these assertions are bad style. could we agree to make them
> speaking errors that tell what is the problem?
> >
> > ede/duply.net <http://duply.net> <http://duply.net>
> >
> > On 01.07.2011 18:44, Michael Schneider wrote:
> > > In fact, I had several duplicates (vol 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, but
> not vol 53 and 54:
> > >
> > > Fo reach duplicate volume, one was empty and one was correct. The
> empty ones look like this:
> > >
> > > Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
> boundary="===============7249155798656478530==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: v2
> Subject: duplicity-inc.20110614T181901Z.to.20110619T192531Z.vol48.difftar.gpg
> --===============7249155798656478530== Content-Type: application/binary
> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
> --===============7249155798656478530==--
> > >
> > > I have no idea why only 5 of 54 volumes where affected. It seems
> (list order in my client) that the empty sets were created after the correct
> ones.
> > >
> > > Deleting the empty files resolved the problem.
> > >
> > > -Mike
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] duplicity 0.6.12 / AssertionError during incremental backup, Michael Terry, 2011/07/01
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] duplicity 0.6.12 / AssertionError during incremental backup, Michael Schneider, 2011/07/01
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] duplicity 0.6.12 / AssertionError during incremental backup, edgar . soldin, 2011/07/01
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] duplicity 0.6.12 / AssertionError during incremental backup, Olivier Berger, 2011/07/01
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] duplicity 0.6.12 / AssertionError during incremental backup, Kenneth Loafman, 2011/07/01
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] duplicity 0.6.12 / AssertionError during incremental backup, edgar . soldin, 2011/07/01
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] duplicity 0.6.12 / AssertionError during incremental backup, Kenneth Loafman, 2011/07/01
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] duplicity 0.6.12 / AssertionError during incremental backup,
edgar . soldin <=
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] duplicity 0.6.12 / AssertionError during incremental backup, Michael Schneider, 2011/07/03