Re: [Duplicity-talk] no-compression still compresses?

[Cory Coager]

If someone can point me in the right direction I can.  I tried troubleshooting this yesterday by hacking the code and wasn't able to get it working.  Where should I be looking?

On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 2:21 PM, <address@hidden> wrote:

thanks for following up. could we interest you in fixing this? any contribution is valued lots.

..ede/duply.net

On 06.03.2013 18:33, Cory Coager wrote:
> Bug ticket id is 1029516.
>

> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Cory Coager <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:
>
>     The resultant files are indeed gzipped as I was able to manually uncompress them. This may be related to the bug you speak of and I updated the ticket yesterday.
>
>

>     On Wednesday, March 6, 2013,  <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:
>     > i see.. so it can be mistaken, cause it only tries to interpret what file type it may be?
>     >
>     > anyway, sigtar, difftar should be untarable with tar, right? so he could try that.
>     >
>     > or, just to find out if it compresses: backup a quite big plain text/sql dump file.. the resulting volume will be significantly smaller if it really compresses although forbidden.
>     >

>     > ..ede/duply.net <http://duply.net>

>     >
>     > On 06.03.2013 16:27, Michael Terry wrote:
>     >> He means running "file XXX".
>     >>
>     >> "file" is a standard GNU/unix command to determine what a file actually is (rather than just by filename).
>     >>
>     >> -mt
>     >>
>     >>

>     >> On 6 March 2013 04:18, <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden> <mailto:address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>>> wrote:
>     >>
>     >>     On 06.03.2013 03:02, Cory Coager wrote:
>     >>     > I'm using --no-encryption and --no-compression for a backup.  I noticed the files have a .difftar extension instead of .difftar.gz. However, running a file against these shows that they are still gzip'd with max compression.  Why is this happening?  Am I missing something?
>     >>     >
>     >>     > I'm using version 0.6.21 from Ubuntu ppa.
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>     shouldn't be.. how do you test? what do you mean by " running a file against these "?
>     >>
>     >>     i wouldn't advise to use --no-compression. afaik it has a bug in restoring currently.. check the launchpadpad bug tracker.
>     >>

>     >>     ..ede/duply.net <http://duply.net> <http://duply.net>
>     >>
>     >>     _______________________________________________
>     >>     Duplicity-talk mailing list
>     >>     address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden> <mailto:address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>>

>     >>     https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> _______________________________________________
>     >> Duplicity-talk mailing list
>     >> address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>
>     >> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk
>     >>
>     >
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > Duplicity-talk mailing list
>     > address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>
>     > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk
>     >
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Duplicity-talk mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk
>

_______________________________________________
Duplicity-talk mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk