[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Duplicity-talk] 0.6.22: new_key on object-less URI
From: |
svoop |
Subject: |
Re: [Duplicity-talk] 0.6.22: new_key on object-less URI |
Date: |
Thu, 5 Sep 2013 08:08:38 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) |
Hi Lee
> but it is important to know that your bucket must not contain
> upper case letters or any other characters that are not valid
> parts of a hostname.
Oops, missed that one. Maybe duplicity could issue a warning for bad bucket
names?
> I think there are two things going on here. The first is that
> I introduced a bug into 0.6.22 that affects backups to the bucket
> root:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/duplicity/+bug/1218425
I've switched to a bucket with subdirectories. Since the buckets don't allow
dots, it's a good idea to wrap all backups in just one bucket.
Now it all works fine again, thanks a bunch for your help!
-sven
- [Duplicity-talk] 0.6.22: new_key on object-less URI, svoop, 2013/09/02
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] 0.6.22: new_key on object-less URI, edgar . soldin, 2013/09/02
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] 0.6.22: new_key on object-less URI, Lee Verberne, 2013/09/02
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] 0.6.22: new_key on object-less URI, svoop, 2013/09/02
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] 0.6.22: new_key on object-less URI, Lee Verberne, 2013/09/02
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] 0.6.22: new_key on object-less URI, edgar . soldin, 2013/09/03
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] 0.6.22: new_key on object-less URI, svoop, 2013/09/03
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] 0.6.22: new_key on object-less URI, Lee Verberne, 2013/09/03
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] 0.6.22: new_key on object-less URI, edgar . soldin, 2013/09/03
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] 0.6.22: new_key on object-less URI,
svoop <=